Hamilton County,Ohio Juvenile Court Judge dispute headed toward Supreme Court

Hamilton County voters last November went the polls to try to elect a juvenile court judge. That still hasn't happened and now we might be headed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

"The underlying issue," it's summed up, "is that there were voters who went to the right polling place, but voted or were directed to vote in the wrong precinct. In other words, right church, but the wrong pew. Over 280,000 people voted on Nov. 2. That included 11,000 people who cast provisional ballots, 800 of which have been questioned."

"As it currently stands," Cincinnati-based WCPO reported last January, "Republican John Williams leads Democrat Tracie Hunter by 23 votes. However, a provisional vote question has led to orders from U.S. District Court Judge Susan Dlott (here & here) on counting hundreds of ballots, rulings (here, here & here) from former Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner and opinions from the Ohio Supreme Court." The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has now heard it, too.(Here)

Now Hamilton County’s Board of Elections has apparently decided to appeal the 6th. Circuit. ( Here )

"It is not a high profile race," Ohio State University's Election Law @ Moritz, said in its Jan. 14 post, (but) "it could create a high profile precedent…. (appearing) to have the potential of forcing the U.S. Supreme Court itself, or at least one of its Justices (indeed, its newest member, Justice Elena Kagan), to weigh in on how the precedent of Bush v. Gore applies to other elections besides the one in which it arose (which was, of course, the 2000 presidential election)."

Utah American Indians decision

Restricting the use of eagle parts and feathers to members of federally recognized American Indian tribes for religious purposes does not violate the religious freedoms of non-Indians seeking the same right, an Associate Press/ MSNBC article relayed last week from Denver's 10th. U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. (U.S. v. Wilgus, 09-4046 on March 29th.)

Federal law prohibits possession of the feathers or parts of eagles, but contains an exception to when the feathers are possessed "for the religious purposes of Indian tribes." The regulations implementing the exception limit its scope only to members of federally-recognized tribes , of which there are 565, and they're required to apply permits. (See "Eagle Act")

The defendant, here, was arrested in possession of 141 bald & golden eagle feathers. He is "a follower of a Native American faith", though not a member of a federally-recognized tribe, nor an Indian by birth. He "interposed as a defense," the Court's decision said, "the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 ("RFRA"), which prohibits the federal government from substantially burdening the religious freedom of individuals, unless it does so to forward a compelling governmental interest via the least restrictive means. (He) argued that the government's choice to limit legal possession of eagle feathers to members of federally-recognized tribes substantially burdens his religious exercise which, he claims, requires him to possess eagle feathers.

The District Court of Utah hadn't accepted this argument, but the Appeals Court, here, sitting en banc, reversed and ordered a hearing on whether the "Eagle Act" was the least restrictive means of serving the government's interests. [United States v. Hardman, 297 F.3d 1116, 1135-36 (10th Cir. 2002) (en banc)]. The district court on remand conducted a number of hearings, considering both live testimony and documentary evidence, and held that application of the "Eagle Act" in this instance did violate "RFRA". [ United States v. Wilgus, 606 F. Supp. 2d 1308, 1334-35 (D. Utah 2009) ]

The Court here again reverses.

Upcoming CLEs

We're pleased to offer the following CLE opportunities in April and May. Our CLEs are free to current subscribers.

April 14: Two Westlaw sessions: Basics 12:30-1:30 Secondary Sources 1:45-2:45
April 19: Lexis Search Tips- 1:00-2:00
May 27: Prenuptial Basics with presenter Cathy R. Cook - 1:00-2:00

All have been approved for 1.0 hour of general Ohio CLE. To sign up, please call 513.946.5300. The Lexis and Westlaw CLEs are $35 each for nonsubscribers. The Prenuptial Basics CLE is $50 for nonsubscribers.

If you'd like information about joining the Law Library, see http://www.hamilton-co.org/cinlawlib/join.html