Three principal areas are indicated as being where the state could make improvements that could reduce crime and use existing resources in a more fiscally responsible manner:
- Short sentences for property and drug offenders are not effective at reducing recidivism and create a costly "revolving door."
- Community correction programs do not have clear criteria to inform the selection of program participants, making it difficult for these programs to be cost-effective tools for diverting people from prison and reducing crime.
- Ohio's probation system is a patchwork of independent agencies that do not have consistent policies.
No comments:
Post a Comment